I’m pro-safety. I’ve been first on-scene for accidents. I’ve lost coworkers. I’ve gone to court over a colleague’s jobsite injury. Working people are my people, and I want them to go home to their families in one piece. But safety has gotten way out of control.
What started as common-sense OSHA compliance drifted into performative safety theater that crushes morale without making the work any safer. And the worst part? It’s driven by money, not keeping people safe.
The problem: safety clutter
There’s a name for the binders, duplicate checklists, and rituals that don’t change how the work is done: safety clutter. It’s the pile of procedures and roles “done in the name of safety” that don’t actually improve safety at the point of work. Crews know the difference between something that helps and something that’s there to tick a box. The Safety of Work+1
That dog-and-pony show breeds surface compliance. We sign the sheet, sit through the orientation, slap a sticker on the hard hat, and tune out. Not because we don’t care, but because we’ve heard the same generic messages for years and they don’t connect to the task in front of us.
Chasing the wrong number: TRIR
Construction has worshiped TRIR for decades. Quick refresher:
TRIR = (OSHA-recordables × 200,000) ÷ total hours worked. The 200,000 represents 100 people working full time for a year. OSHA
Here’s the issue. TRIR ignores severity, swings wildly with smaller hour counts, and pushes people to manage the number instead of the risk. A widely cited analysis by Matthew Hallowell and co-authors calls TRIR statistically invalid as a performance metric. Use it for compliance and rough benchmarking, not as your steering wheel. EEI
When companies chase a dashboard, injuries get buried. Research shows significant under-recording in OSHA logs, especially in small shops and among Hispanic workers. That makes the spreadsheet look great while the Urgent Care stays busy. CPWR+1
Follow the money: EMR, OCIP, CCIP
Workers’ comp premiums hinge on your Experience Modification Rate (EMR) also known as “mod rate”. A 1.0 EMR is “average.” Below 1.0 lowers premiums and can unlock work; above 1.0 does the opposite. Many owners bake EMR thresholds into prequalification. The City of Thornton, CO, for example, expects a three-year average EMR at or below 1.0, with anything above 1.2 potentially disqualifying. Insureon+1
On larger jobs you’ll see wrap-ups (OCIP or CCIP) where the owner or GC centralizes coverage. Good in theory, but they often arrive with blanket rules and paperwork for every sub, regardless of task risk. The policy wants uniformity, but the field needs specificity. The Baldwin Group
When safety gets framed as “protect the premium” and “don’t make the spreadsheet angry,” crews get the message: don’t hurt the number. That’s not the same as controlling high-energy hazards.
How this crushes morale
Most of us resent safety theater because it feels insincere. People who’ve never done the task lecture the trades on risk, while the real driver is cost and prequal. Crews show up for real risk management: critical picks, live systems, line-of-fire controls. They go through the motions for box-checking. I’ve seen the glazed-over expression as I read a PTP to my crew- they’re just waiting for me to stop so they can go to work.
Pre-task planning (PTP) is the perfect example. Done right, it’s a short, specific conversation that drives the day’s controls. Done wrong, it’s just another form. Research on “Take 5” style pre-task cards found no evidence they reduce risk the way people claim when they’re enforced as rote paperwork. CPWR’s own guidance suggests focusing PTP on the work in front of you and verifying controls. MDPI+2CPWR+2
A quick example: winter hats under hard hats
OSHA’s position is about maintaining the helmet’s performance and electrical class. Cold-weather caps can be worn under hard hats if they don’t interfere with proper fit or electrical properties. Yet I still see blanket bans that ignore the actual interpretation, which just makes people cold for no safety gain. Those of us with no hair need some extra insulation! OSHA+1
Reality check: serious harm isn’t going away
If paperwork were the solution, we’d see fewer serious outcomes. We don’t. CPWR’s recent data show Hispanic construction fatalities increased 107% from 2011 to 2022, outpacing non-Hispanic workers by a wide margin. That should snap everyone back to reality: measure and manage the hazards that actually kill and maim. CPWR
A better way crews respect
1) Cut the clutter. Kill or shrink anything that doesn’t change how the task is performed. Keep the stuff that shapes decisions at the point of work. The Safety of Work
2) Fix the metrics. Keep the required lagging data, but stop steering with them. Track control verification on high-energy tasks, quality of permits, and learning reviews after close calls. EEI
3) Rebuild PTP. Make it a five-minute talk, not a worksheet. One page, large font, today’s hazards, named controls, done. Let the crew speak. Stories from peers about hazards stick better than words on a page. CPWR+1
4) Treat morale like a safety control. Supervisors who listen, act on concerns, and adapt the plan keep people switched on. That alone reduces drift into risky shortcuts since there is a level of “buy-in” from the crew. CPWR+1
5) Align rules with actual standards. The winter-cap example is low-hanging fruit. Follow OSHA and manufacturer guidance so comfort and protection work together. OSHA
Bottom line
We didn’t sign up to act out safety. We signed up to control risk and do quality work so we can get paid and go home. Insurance incentives and vanity metrics have twisted the culture. Put the focus back on the men and women in the field: verify the controls that matter and stop fluffing numbers for a spreadsheet.
Join the Discussion